Leader

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The Next President of the U.S.

Collapse

300x250 Mobile

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Originally posted by toby101
    Haven't you seen those signs where it says the only B__H I trust is my own.

    Or

    The only d__k I trust is my own.
    Nope, but those are even funnier!

    Comment


    • #47
      Originally posted by trpr2b
      I would love to see Newt elected.
      Newt Gingrich is one of the biggest hypocrits ever to descend upon American politics. While getting red-faced and out of breath railing against the Clinton-Lewinsky affair, slimy Newt was sleeping with his Congressional Aide Callista Bisek (now his wife) who was, and still is, 23 years his junior. This was cheating on his second wife, Marianne, who Newt married after he asked his cancer-stricken first wife for a divorce, while she was still in the hospital!

      Sounds like an upstanding citizen to me!
      *Not a cop*

      Comment


      • #48
        Originally posted by lsmalibu
        Newt Gingrich is one of the biggest hypocrits ever to descend upon American politics. While getting red-faced and out of breath railing against the Clinton-Lewinsky affair, slimy Newt was sleeping with his Congressional Aide Callista Bisek (now his wife) who was, and still is, 23 years his junior. This was cheating on his second wife, Marianne, who Newt married after he asked his cancer-stricken first wife for a divorce, while she was still in the hospital!

        Sounds like an upstanding citizen to me!

        I remember when Bush past was brought up about him having a drinking problem.

        And Al Gore use to smoke dope once in a blue moon, so they are still human.

        Comment


        • #49
          Originally posted by Brav989
          John McCain
          maybe but I dont think his heart will hold up... he may not make it to 08

          Comment


          • #50
            Ismalibu,

            Are you trying to tell us that there is a legitimate analogy between Clinton's commtting three felonies in order to conceal his MO and Newt Gingrich's behavior?

            Please tell me what it is permissbale to commit perjury, suborn it, and obstruct justice, all felonies.


            Good luck,

            JW

            Comment


            • #51
              Originally posted by Josey Wales
              Ismalibu,

              Are you trying to tell us that there is a legitimate analogy between Clinton's commtting three felonies in order to conceal his MO and Newt Gingrich's behavior?

              Please tell me what it is permissbale to commit perjury, suborn it, and obstruct justice, all felonies.


              Good luck,

              JW
              Josey,

              I know you took a "Reading Comprehension for Conservatives" class in college, so please point out where I ever excused Clinton's behavior.
              *Not a cop*

              Comment


              • #52
                I like Rudy Gulliani but he won't get the GOP nomination with his views on abortion. McCain might get it but he's pretty old and might be viewed as too moderate. How about former Montana Gov. Marc Racicot?

                Comment


                • #53
                  Ismalibu,

                  Actually, m'man, the deductive logic used to decipher the intent of your post was extremely elementary. You employed a rather rudimentary arguing technique known as comparative ethics. The only reason to do so is to justify a party's immoral actions by pointing out -and in this case, incorrectly- that actions of another are equally immoral.

                  But in the extremly slight chance I am wrong, why would you attempt to link Clinton's three felonies with Newt's marital indiscretions? And the very least, it is an extremely weak analogy.


                  Stay safe,

                  JW
                  Last edited by Josey Wales; 10-11-2005, 12:23 PM.

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    my vote....

                    I dont care anymore... No matter who gets voted in, they're not going to be able to please everyone, people will still bitch and complain about how ****ty the country in bein ran... I honestly dont care anymore. Gas prices will still suck, I still wont have S.S in 40 years, taxes will still be the same... The only thing that changes are the jokes and complaints everyone will make...
                    Last edited by RedDog4; 10-11-2005, 12:32 PM.
                    Irish Toasts
                    When we drink, we get drunk.
                    When we get drunk, we fall asleep.
                    When we fall asleep, we commit no sin.
                    When we commit no sin, we go to heaven.
                    So, let's all get drunk, and go to heaven!

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      my vote....

                      duplicate......
                      Irish Toasts
                      When we drink, we get drunk.
                      When we get drunk, we fall asleep.
                      When we fall asleep, we commit no sin.
                      When we commit no sin, we go to heaven.
                      So, let's all get drunk, and go to heaven!

                      Comment


                      • #56
                        Originally posted by Josey Wales
                        Ismalibu,

                        Actually, m'man, the deductive logic used to decipher the intent of your post was extremely elementary. You employed a rather rudimentary arguing technique known as comparative ethics. The only reason to do so is to justify a party's immoral actions by pointing out -and in this case, incorrectly- that actions of another are equally immoral.

                        But in the extremly slight chance I am wrong, why would you attempt to link Clinton's three felonies with Newt's marital indiscretions? And the very least, it is an extremely weak analogy.


                        Stay safe,

                        JW
                        Wow, JW, you sure are fond of reading between the lines, even if there are no lines to begin with. A comparative ethics arguement would go something like this: "Well, Newt Gingrich cheated left 2 of his wives for mistresses, so what Clinton did wasn't that bad," and therefore attempting to excuse Clinton's actions. However, I don't attempt to excuse Clinton, I only mentioned him to provide a frame of reference as to the time when Newt was shtupping his Aide. If you want to get into comparative ethics, we can. Do I think lying about oral sex is as bad as leaving your cancer-stricken wife for a mistress? Not really. But since Clinton is a big, bad felon and Newt is just a scumbag piece of crap, I guess it's a lot easier for you to stand by your man.
                        Last edited by lsmalibu; 10-11-2005, 02:23 PM.
                        *Not a cop*

                        Comment


                        • #57
                          Ismalibu,

                          Let's contrast what you wrote here...

                          Wow, JW, you sure are fond of reading between the lines, even if there are no lines to begin with.
                          with another of your contributions...

                          But since Clinton is a big, bad felon and Newt is just a scumbag piece of crap, I guess it's a lot easier for you to stand by your man.
                          Do you detect irony here....?

                          Let's continue:

                          However, I don't attempt to excuse Clinton, I only mentioned him to provide a frame of reference as to the time when Newt was shtupping his Aide.
                          Your "frame of reference" is a connoation of analogy. The mere fact that you did use Newt in relation to Clinton is to attempt to draw a similarity; under the conditions presented, it was patently illogical. But the bottom line is that you did use the arguning tactic of comparative ethics with the intent of comparing Newt with Clinton in terms of marital transgressions.

                          Never, ever forget this, m'man: CLINTON DID NOT LIE TO CONCEAL AN AFFAIR WITH MONICA. THAT'S THE MEDIA LINE PROVIDED BY THE CLINTON PREVARICATORS!!! CLINTON LIED TO CONCEAL HIS M.O. AS A SERIAL SEXUAL PREDATOR!!! When Paula Jones's attorney was examining Clinton's M.O., very powerful evidence, he knew as an attorney what was happening. He had a choice between admitting his pattern of conduct or lying. He chose lying because he couldn't bring himself to admit to those he duped with regularity and impunity that they were supporting a sexual predator. Therefore, idiots like Boxer, Feinstein, even Hillary became that which they rail against: ENABLERS!!! Their actions enabled a felony sexual predator to remain in a position of power where he could continue to victimize other women!



                          Adios,

                          JW

                          Comment


                          • #58
                            How about Geena Davis character in Commander and Chief??? Ill take that president anyday
                            Officer Schilling ]

                            Comment


                            • #59
                              Originally posted by hellhound130
                              How about Geena Davis character in Commander and Chief??? Ill take that president anyday
                              I am glad that you brought this up. Here is my "conspiracy theory": The left wing radical liberals in Hollywood have ceated this series depicting a strong female president with one goal in mind - to soften americans to the idea of a female president. This show has begun airing a couple of years before Hillary will run for president. By the time we vote, many of the dimwitted americans that have grown to like the fictional charcter in the tv show will believe that having a female president would be a good thing. More votes for Hillary.

                              I am not saying that having a female president would be bad, but the timing of this is interesting.

                              Comment


                              • #60
                                Originally posted by richjorg
                                I am glad that you brought this up. Here is my "conspiracy theory": The left wing radical liberals in Hollywood have ceated this series depicting a strong female president with one goal in mind - to soften americans to the idea of a female president. This show has begun airing a couple of years before Hillary will run for president. By the time we vote, many of the dimwitted americans that have grown to like the fictional charcter in the tv show will believe that having a female president would be a good thing. More votes for Hillary.
                                That's not only plausible, it's probable.
                                Talk sense to a fool, and he will call you foolish - Euripides

                                Comment

                                MR300x250 Tablet

                                Collapse

                                What's Going On

                                Collapse

                                There are currently 4953 users online. 315 members and 4638 guests.

                                Most users ever online was 26,947 at 08:36 PM on 12-29-2019.

                                Welcome Ad

                                Collapse
                                Working...
                                X