Leader

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Why do Harley-Davidson police motorcycles have a top speed less than a Toyota Prius?

Collapse

300x250 Mobile

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    I'm sure that the $1 leases that HD offers to LE departments wouldn't have anything to do with administrators choosing them...
    "He who fights with monsters might take care lest he thereby become a monster. And if you gaze for long into an abyss, the abyss gazes also into you."
    -Friedrich Nietzsche

    Comment


    • Aidokea
      Aidokea commented
      Editing a comment
      Wow. I'm sure glad that Nerf hasn't offered $1 leases on Nerf guns to replace our Glocks with...

  • #17
    Haha that is brutal. My theory is I don't want to pay 21st century prices for 20th century technology. I've been riding for 15+ years and teaching the CMSP basic class for a while now. I've ridden hundreds of different motorcycles and roughly 75-80 different unique models, all road bikes. Not one HD. Had my chance back in February when a friend bought his first. I dropped off another bike of his I borrowed and he said I should try the HD he just got. It wouldn't start (he left the key on for about 15 minutes after getting home with it from buying it). He sold it a month later. It's like the gods of motorcycles don't want me to ride one. I've always been turned off by the dealer experience and the attitude of many HD riders.

    Comment


    • #18
      In the department I retired from, the officer owned the motorcycle they rode and the city paid us a set allotment each month to cover the bills. That worked out best for us because we could use the machine for escorting oversize loads and funerals. I'm sure the city would have wanted part of the paycheck if we'd used their equipment.

      The best I can remember, I rode six different motorcycles during my time in motorcycle division. The first one was a Kawasaki Police 1000, which was a fantastic performance machine with no frills, then 4 different Hondas that a local dealership converted for police work and my last one was a Kawasaki again.......mainly due to the price the Honda was selling for. I had no complaint ever about the performance of any one of my bikes. At one time, I was the only officer in the squad not on a Harley which was a topic of discussion in the LT's office.......but I flat out told him the Harley was too slow, did not brake and handle as well as the converted Honda and I liked the low roar of power they had, instead of the loud mufflers of the Harley that only impressed outlaw bikers. I seriously didn't want to listen to that all day long. And, a buddy up north sent me a link to an article back in 2010 that said "Michigan State Police objectively prove that Harleys suck". I agreed with them, absolutely.
      If your biggest work-related fear is getting a paper cut, don't try and tell a cop how to do his job.

      Comment


    • #19
      Originally posted by 9L81 View Post
      I've always been turned off by the dealer experience and the attitude of many HD riders.
      That would probably be the subject of a whole thread all by itself.

      Comment


      • #20
        Never knew Harleys were junk until this thread.

        My former agency had 2 Harleys that were in good condition however just sat and collected dust. Whenever I asked why, I would never get a logical response. A complete waste of resources.
        Gov Blagojevich - "I'am the American dream...."

        Comment


        • #21
          I have a feeling there is a dislike for Harleys in this thread.

          I had a Softail for about a year. Not one the job of course, but it was plenty fast for me. I hated to go to the local dealership for anything. You were never allowing we’d to look at anything by yourself and the sales people were high pressure.

          I stopped in one day to get a small part and a new catalog. As I was leaving the anti-theft alarm went off. I stopped and turned around and there were five guys running toward me. I was questioned, my receipt examined and my bag they just gave me searched. They finally realized that they didn’t deactivate their anti-theft device on the part they had just sold me. Not long after that I sold the bike back to the guy I bought it from and never looked back.

          Comment


          • #22
            Originally posted by StephDakel View Post
            Never knew Harleys were junk until this thread.
            I'm glad we were able to help...

            Comment


            • #23
              Originally posted by FireCop203 View Post
              I have a feeling there is a dislike for Harleys in this thread.
              It's not a dislike- I simply have no use for them.

              Motorcycling on public roadways is exceptionally dangerous, and road-going motorcyclists are only as safe as the weakest link in the "chain of safety".

              The three links of the chain of safety consist of the riding skill set, safety gear, and the motorcycle.

              ALL THREE of those things need to be developed to a reasonably survivable degree of competency- having only one or two (or worst of all, none) of those links developed to a reasonably survivable degree of competency, creates a high probability that the motorcyclist will be confronted with situation(s) that will result in injury or death.

              A Harley-Davidson would be the weakest link in the chain of safety for any skilled rider wearing proper safety gear.

              Ironically, most Harley-Davidson owners choose to wear costumes instead of proper safety gear.

              But the weakest link amongst most Harley-Davidson owners by far, even weaker than their lack of proper safety gear, even weaker than their Harley-Davidson itself, is the almost total lack of riding skill possessed by most Harley-Davidson owners. That's why I avoid referring to them as "riders", because the word "rider" implies that the motorcyclist actually knows how to ride.

              Motorcycle riding is a very counter-intuitive skill set- almost everything works the exact opposite way that lay people assume it works, so the chances of just "figuring it out" on their own, apart from any competent formal rider training, is just about zero. Most Harley-Davidson owners start out by trial-and-error, until they can get it rolling without stalling the engine...and then they just stop learning. What they mistake for an advancing skill set, is actually them just becoming more and more comfortable over time, at NOT knowing how to ride. The ones that survive their crashes, often confabulate the ridiculous story that they "had to lay 'er down" to avoid a crash, apparently not realizing that falling down IS a crash. The reason they make up this story, is because they don't know how to ride, so they don't understand what happened, and they're too embarrassed to admit it.

              Two red flags that can indicate right off that a motorcyclist doesn't know how to ride, is a preference for cruisers and a fear of horsepower (like Harley-Davidsons). Unlike all other types of motorcycles, cruisers have no legitimate functional purpose. And of the three major control inputs (throttle, front brake, and handlebars), the throttle is simplest/easiest/least counter-intuitive to learn, as well as being the LEAST powerful control of the three major control inputs (even on the most powerful motorcycles). So if they're afraid of the throttle, they're probably also not able to steer or brake effectively.

              Another common indicator of a motorcyclist that doesn't know how to ride, is a fear of the front brake. This one is often articulated as a fear that they'll "flip over the handlebars" if they use the front brake too hard. These are the guys who tend to crash from attempting to use the rear brake while in motion, and then go for the "had to lay 'er down" lie.

              And the most common indicator of a motorcyclist that doesn't know how to ride, is the false idea that motorcycles can be effectively steered at anything above a walking speed by pushing the handlebars in the same direction as the intended turn, and/or the false idea that motorcycles can be effectively steered by leaning.

              Comment

              MR300x250 Tablet

              Collapse

              What's Going On

              Collapse

              There are currently 5262 users online. 211 members and 5051 guests.

              Most users ever online was 19,482 at 11:44 AM on 09-29-2011.

              Welcome Ad

              Collapse
              Working...
              X