Leader

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Please bring REDDERS4786 back.

Collapse

300x250 Mobile

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Tim Dees
    replied
    It is forum policy that we do not discuss members' accounts or actions taken with regard to them. Thread closed.

    Leave a comment:


  • mavriktu
    replied
    Redders--eman2k5------kickit--------all banned in one day for disagreeing with a decision.Even murderers get a trial and appeal. Just in case ,I guess I will say my adios' now.

    Leave a comment:


  • Enikad
    replied
    IPB, VB, and BB, style HTML web forums have no feature that automatically enables a regular user to ban another user. A report notice gets sent to an Administrator or Super-moderator (if his account enables user bans), then the Admin gets a link to the post and the Users IP address is displayed under the name, then said Admin goes into the Administrators Control Panel and bans the user, for either a period of time, and or an indefinite I.P. ban. However you have to be careful with I.P. bans since multiple users may post from the same I.P. and you could lose 4 where you only wanted 1.

    Also the user that was banned needs to check his posting rules tab at the bottom of the page:

    You may post new threads
    You may post replies
    You may post attachments
    You may edit your posts
    vB code is On
    Smilies are On
    [IMG] code is On
    HTML code is On

    If these are switched to may not, and off, then he's be banned for a good length. If only a few are turned off its kinda a slap on the hand. But the user should still be able to Lurk (view without being signed in) on the boards short of an I.P. ban. And use the private messaging system to communicate with Admins and Mods.

    I've run a lot of forums in my day.

    O.com runs on a Vbulletin engine, which is less exploitable than IPB(debatable now), and BB. Which is probably why the admins chose it for community control.

    Leave a comment:


  • kicket
    replied
    Rabbi was out witted and got mad so he got the man banned its Bull shame on Ocom god forbide we have a dissucission long live the trolls is what i hear from Ocom,Ban the cops.I thought this was a Cop friendly site....oops maybe not lately its a front i tell ya call SWAT.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ritchie
    replied
    Rabi was just making fun of peoples "easily bruised egos.

    Then he goes crying because his wee feewings got huwt.


    Not all Non LEO are like Rabbi.
    Some of us are decent.
    Then again... being a "Non=Leo" is hopefully a temporary problem for some of us.

    Leave a comment:


  • Entre Nous
    replied
    I'd be surprised if it's completely automatic. I'm sure they at least read the post and make sure you're not being reported just for disagreeing on an issue.

    Leave a comment:


  • Traffic_82
    replied
    I didn't see anything inappropriate either... .
    I've said worse...is the system automatic?

    Leave a comment:


  • Entre Nous
    replied
    I do think that the banning is now equal though. It's not like before when you'd report a troll over and over again and nothing would happen, while an officer would get banned at the drop of a hat. Now it seems people are getting banned right and left, and for the most part it's deserved. It's sad when it happens to someone like Redders, but I think we have to take the bad with the good.

    Leave a comment:


  • willowdared
    replied
    Originally posted by Sgt. Geezer
    It doesn't appear to be a "reasonable standard".

    I've got concerns that it may be an "automatic" system where if someone inputs a report on one of your posts ...... you automatically get toasted.
    Meh! It's how it works here. It's a reflection of real life, isn't it? The non-LE members come in here and push for an argument, then run crying to the Mods when someone tells them the truth. Sworn officers are so used to putting up with morons, the thought of reporting their posts never occurs to them.

    Once again, an LEO gets banned, while Slowing Doodles, spambots like Melisa, and all the other anti-LEO's stay, adding no value what-so-ever.

    Here's my question. Is Slowing Dee gonna buy any of the products advertised here? Attend any of the Conferences? I don't think so. Redders? Isn't he a recently promoted Sergeant? Maybe he has a say in what his department decides to purchase? Who exactly do they want to belong here? It doesn't seem to be Law Enforcement professionals.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sgt. Geezer
    replied
    Not reasonable.

    It doesn't appear to be a "reasonable standard".

    I've got concerns that it may be an "automatic" system where if someone inputs a report on one of your posts ...... you automatically get toasted.

    Leave a comment:


  • aftermath
    replied
    he got shafted IMO.

    Leave a comment:


  • Irishluck31
    replied
    That cant be why he got banned. Theres nothing at all worth banning sombody in that thread.

    He got reported for rudness I guess thats a matter of opinion, but worthy of banning sombody, i dont think so.

    i am not one to sign petitions in most cases and I dont even know or much care about either party involved, but it seems a bit silly to me.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sgt. Geezer
    replied
    Here it is.

    http://forums.officer.com/forums/showthread.php?t=63929

    Leave a comment:


  • equinox137
    replied
    Which thread was this?

    Leave a comment:


  • eman2k5
    replied
    Follow my signature to find redders






    but yes redders, i think all you got was a 10 day ban



    see you on offduty redders.

    Leave a comment:

MR300x250 Tablet

Collapse

What's Going On

Collapse

There are currently 2895 users online. 182 members and 2713 guests.

Most users ever online was 158,966 at 04:57 AM on 01-16-2021.

Welcome Ad

Collapse
Working...
X