Yesterday, dispatch sent me to speak with a lady regarding an 'undesirable' visitor. As soon as I heard the address, I knew what 'it' was about.
This lady got tired of her 'boyfriend' SEVERAL months ago, and attempted to break it off...so she says. She keeps coming home from work, etc, and finding him INSIDE her home...so she says. She wants him GONE....so she says.
So...I finally convince her to go to the clerk's office and get an 'order of protection' against him. I also encourage her landlord to go along and get a 'trespass warrant' taken out, which he does NOT do, as I found out later.
Anyway, sure enough, this guy IS inside her home. We've never been able to catch him before. Knocking on the door and apparently getting him out of bed, HE says SHE let him inside.
Hmmm.....I was present yesterday when the landlord changed the locks AND secured the window SHE said he used to gain access inside. Something 'smells'....
So...I arrest him for violation of the 'order' and take him to jail. In the meantime, I intend to find out if she DID let him in, AFTER obtaining an order of protection. If she did, her @$$ belongs to the judge....
WHY did she apparently do just the OPPOSITE of what she claims she wanted to do....? Insights, anyone?
This lady got tired of her 'boyfriend' SEVERAL months ago, and attempted to break it off...so she says. She keeps coming home from work, etc, and finding him INSIDE her home...so she says. She wants him GONE....so she says.
So...I finally convince her to go to the clerk's office and get an 'order of protection' against him. I also encourage her landlord to go along and get a 'trespass warrant' taken out, which he does NOT do, as I found out later.
Anyway, sure enough, this guy IS inside her home. We've never been able to catch him before. Knocking on the door and apparently getting him out of bed, HE says SHE let him inside.
Hmmm.....I was present yesterday when the landlord changed the locks AND secured the window SHE said he used to gain access inside. Something 'smells'....
So...I arrest him for violation of the 'order' and take him to jail. In the meantime, I intend to find out if she DID let him in, AFTER obtaining an order of protection. If she did, her @$$ belongs to the judge....
WHY did she apparently do just the OPPOSITE of what she claims she wanted to do....? Insights, anyone?
Comment