Leader

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

In 1st CA medical parole case, inmate rejected

Collapse

300x250 Mobile

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • In 1st CA medical parole case, inmate rejected

    http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl...MNC41JKI8D.DTL

    (05-25) 04:00 PDT Corcoran, Kings County --

    A state board on Tuesday denied medical parole to a convicted rapist who has been a quadriplegic since he was attacked in prison 10 years ago, arguing that the inmate's verbal threats in prison to female staffers proves he would still pose a threat to public safety if he were to be released.

    Steven Martinez, 42, was the first California inmate to be considered for medical parole under a law that took effect this year and is aimed at saving taxpayers the expense of providing medical care and security to incapacitated inmates. Under the law, inmates who are "permanently medically incapacitated with a medical condition" that makes them "unable to perform activities of basic daily living" may be released if they do not pose a threat to public safety.

    In announcing the decision after two hours of deliberations, a two-person panel of the State Board of Parole Hearings cited Martinez's lengthy disciplinary record, including threats to nurses and other prison staff members who have cared for him at the Corcoran State Prison's Acute Care Hospital.

    Those disciplinary charges were the focus of much of the nearly 2 1/2-hour hearing. Martinez's attorney, Ken Karan, acknowledged that Martinez is "difficult" and "annoying" but argued that any conflicts were largely the result of personality clashes with individual staff members and a fear on Martinez's part that his own safety was at risk. Karan disputed staff members' account of the incidents in several cases.

    'Violent person'

    Board commissioner John Peck and deputy commissioner Dan Moeller disagreed.

    "This panel finds that he is a violent person who can use other people to carry out threats and would be a public safety threat to those attending to him outside prison walls," Peck said.

    The commissioner said it was a "tough decision," but noted that female staff members were the target of Martinez's ire in eight of the nine formal disciplinary cases that have been brought against him since 2003.

    That is significant, Peck said, "because his commitment offense was a very violent attack and rape of a female."

    Martinez was arrested on March 28, 1998, after he hit a woman with his car, punched her in the face, threw her in the backseat of his car and drove her to a secluded area to rape her. The attack was eventually interrupted by a police officer. Martinez is serving a 157-year sentence after he was convicted of multiple felonies in connection with the attack, including forcible rape and forcible oral copulation.

    Attacked in prison

    In February 2001, Martinez was attacked by two inmates at Centinela State Prison and stabbed in the neck with a knife, severing his spinal cord and leaving him paralyzed from the neck down. Court documents show that he has no motor power in his arms and legs, can barely move his head, does not have control over his bowel or bladder and has "no chance of regaining any motor skills."

    His medical bills now average $625,000 a year; three years ago, he was rejected for compassionate release, which allows a court to "recall" an inmates' sentence if he is terminally ill and expected to die within six months, or medically incapacitated. Medical parole is different, because people released would have conditions imposed and could be sent back to prison if they violate those terms, or if their medical condition improves.

    Karan, Martinez's attorney, said that his client suffers from post-traumatic stress disorder and is no more difficult to his caretakers than any paralyzed person who must depend on others for the simplest tasks. He said Martinez's victim supported his earlier appeal for compassionate release, and he disputed the parole board's contention that his client would enlist others to carry out violent acts if he were to be released, noting that his previous offenses were "crimes of passion."
    Fits the profile

    "There is simply no evidence that Mr. Martinez would do something he's never done in the past," he said. "Who would help him anyway? He's hated by everyone in the world, except his mother, father and me."

    Karan also argued that Martinez was exactly the type of person intended for release under the state's medical parole law, which was authored by Sen. Mark Leno, D-San Francisco, and signed last year by then-Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger. Leno estimates that the measure could save the struggling state up to $200 million in total if all of the medically incapacitated inmates were to be released.

    "What we've been doing is spending money and not getting anything for it ... except an insatiable desire by some for vengeance," Karan said. "Vengeance for vengeance sake is something we can no longer afford."

    Karan declined to comment after the hearing. Two more medical parole hearings, for two child molesters, are scheduled to take place next month.

  • #2
    With the mandate to release over 30,000 prisoners, I would not be surprised if the governor releases him anyway.
    Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored. -- Aldous Huxley
    Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity. -- Albert Einstein

    Comment


    • #3
      A few yrs ago the Iowa governor pardoned a lifer who had a stroke and became a paraplegic.

      This allowed him to be placed in a nursing home and saved the state the cost of treatment.

      However he had no way of threatening anyone due to his inability to speak after his stroke, nor was he able to assault anoyone.


      It sounds like the Calif system worked on this case.
      Since some people need to be told by notes in crayon .......Don't PM me with without prior permission. If you can't discuss the situation in the open forum ----it must not be that important

      My new word for the day is FOCUS, when someone irritates you tell them to FOCUS

      Comment


      • #4
        I remember this being brought up in my CJA BS classes. Should states continue to hold criminals when they cost more to house due to medical costs. The discussion got pretty heated with some citing pedophiles that were senior citizens still being able to commit the crime, while others argued is the expense worth keeping someone that could never commit the original crime they were sent to prison for due to age or disability. I figure on a case by case basis prisons can reduce the population by releasing disabled and those medically incapable of re-offending, be it due to disability or terminal disease.
        GOD IS A NINJA WITH A SNIPER RIFLE, WAITING TO TAKE YOU OUT.

        "For weapons training they told me to play DOOM"

        Comment


        • #5
          Go ahead and release him. Just park him right outside the prison gates, in a wheelchair, with a sign around his neck that says "Paralyzed Rapist: Free to a Good Home". 4-7 days later (depending on the heat), he's not a burden on anyone anymore.
          Lt. Col. Grace - "Lt. Murphey, why are you all dressed up to mack on the ladies?"
          Me - "Sir, you just answered your own question."

          Comment


          • #6
            Using the logic (?) argued here, "life" sentences shouldn't really mean life. People get old, they become disabled, they get injured in fights with other prisoners. Please explain to me exactly how does this change the fact that they were sentenced to serve this time in a custody facility?

            Jails and prisons don't just house those convicted of serious crimes, they punish the offenders by restricting many types of activities and send a message to other potential violators. If released from prison, even the quadriplegic inmate would be able to enjoy many rights that those serving out their sentences couldn't enjoy (unrestricted use of the internet, telephone, visitations, satellite TV, porn, etc...). Reducing prison populations at the expense of justice is a slap in the face to victims: past, present and future. Punishment is a valid purpose for incarceration in and of itself.

            This reminds me of a documentary I viewed awhile back on the "History Channel" about Folsom Prison. Prisoners sentenced to "life" weren't even allowed to leave the prison grounds after they died. Regardless of the decedent's wishes or those of their family, convicts who died (while serving time) were buried on prison grounds. A small price to pay considering the nature of the crimes that earned them these sentences (IMHO).
            Last edited by pulicords; 05-26-2011, 11:58 AM.
            "I'm not fluent in the language of violence, but I know enough to get around in places where it's spoken."

            Comment


            • #7
              Not to mention, he will probably end up on government healthcare anyways when he gets out. I doubt there is much savings to be had

              Comment


              • #8
                He could still pose a threat, you all recall that paraplegic guy who beat the s hit out of the guy that was molesting his grand daughter???
                It could be that the purpose of your life is only to serve as a warning to others.

                Comment

                MR300x250 Tablet

                Collapse

                What's Going On

                Collapse

                There are currently 3394 users online. 178 members and 3216 guests.

                Most users ever online was 26,947 at 07:36 PM on 12-29-2019.

                Welcome Ad

                Collapse
                Working...
                X