Does anyone know the case law from 1997 that is similar to Mimms vs Pa. regarding our ability to make drivers and passengers exit vehicles while on a stop? Thanks.
NEW Welcome Ad
Collapse
Leader
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Caselaw similar to Mimms vs Pa...
Collapse
300x250 Mobile
Collapse
X
-
Most recently:
Arizona v. Johnson,
129 S. Ct. 781 (2009)
"The Supreme Court noted that consistent with previous rulings, a passenger in a vehicle stopped is seized within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment, just as the driver is seized, at the initiation of the stop and until it is over and that the passenger is not free to end the encounter or move about as he wishes."
Based on this, you can order a driver or passenger to exit a vehicle based on reasonable suspicion, officer safety issues, etc.Comment
MR300x250 Tablet
Collapse
What's Going On
Collapse
There are currently 10339 users online. 118 members and 10221 guests.
Most users ever online was 158,966 at 04:57 AM on 01-16-2021.
Tag Cloud
Collapse
Welcome Ad
Collapse
Comment