Multi-shot Electric Shock Weapon

[nemoleg]

[Monty Ealerman]

I think it's a non-professional stupid music video. If you want a serious response, please present some serious information. You don't work for the makers of the device described.

[ChevyPower]

And why would you need a mutishot tazer? I can see the point of one, maybe, but still...

[cgh6366]

It's an interesting idea. I don't like some of the aspects, but I'd like to see more information on it.

Correct website is http://pulldowngun.narod.ru/Home.html

[Monty Ealerman]

There's recently been created a new round for a normal 12 gauge shotgun that delivers the full duration electronic incapacitation pulse sequence without having to have wires running from shooter to target. Multiple shot capability is available. If this poster really worked for a manufacturer in the electronic incapacitation device industry, he'd know about that.

[exdrip]

What happens to the first target once the first round is discharged? they charge!

[nemoleg]

Multi-shot Electric Shock Weapon

.................................................. ................................................

[Monty Ealerman]

We private researchers. We do not work on the government and the companies. Therefore we have nonprofessional video. ...

So you admit that you don't work for the company responsible for the invention.

But we were the first. ... We developed ... We have ... projects in development.

Now you're pretending again to be one of the inventors. You already admitted that you don't work for the company responsible for the invention. Stop claiming credit for work you didn't do.

[nemoleg]

Multi-shot Electric Shock Weapon

.................................................. .................................................. .

[ManInTan]

Make it smaller... I dont have room for that thing on my belt!

[nemoleg]

Multi-shot Electric Shock Weapon

.................................................. .................................................. ...

[Monty Ealerman]

OK, I don't believe you, but if you're the inventors, how about answering some technical questions?

If you can answer them appropriately, I'll stop saying I think you're not the inventors.

What can you say about the capacitors the devices use? 
        What's their dielectric material?
        What's their conductive material?
        What's their charge acquistion rate?
        How fast do they discharge?
        Where in the devices are they located?
What's the propellant?
What metal is used in the probes?
How are the probes sterilized?
Where are the batteries?
What is their capacity?
How is the device charged electrically?
Where is the stepup coil?
What determines the pulse rate?
        Is a 555 timer IC or equivalent used?
        Is an oscillator used?
        Is the pulse rate based at all on the capacitor charge/discharge rate?
What are the specifics of the actuation mechanism?
        How many pounds or grams is the trigger pull?
        What kind of switch or switches are actuated by the trigger?
        Is the triggering mechanism mechanical, electronic, or a combination?
How is the device grounded?

I look forward to your response.

[nemoleg]

Multi-shot Electric Shock Weapon

.................................................. .................................................. ...

[Monty Ealerman]

As we continue to develop our devices, our electronic circuit has many variants. But as far as I understand, this forum – not a forum of electronics. I think for the user of the weapon absolutely not important, what type of the condenser is used.
“How are the probes sterilized?”
In Russia the main way of sterilization – Russian vodka!
What question – such answer.

So you apparently don't know the answers.

Yes, this is a law enforcement forum, not specifically an electronics forum. I asked the electronics questions to see whether you knew what the inventors would surely know, and your evasive answer indicates to me that you don't, and that tends to confirm my belief that you're not an inventor of the device.

I'm not a user of the device. Although I think that for a user of the device, to have a good idea of how the electronics work is important, my reason for asking what type of capacitors, OK "condenser" if you prefer, were used wasn't so that I would know; it was so I could find out whether YOU knew.

It's not a trade secret, or anything. I can find out by opening one of the devices. I think your reason for not answering the questions is that you don't know the answers, because you're not an inventor of the device.

As for the barbs, your indication that you don't know how they're sterilized makes it clear that you're not the inventor.

If you really were one of the inventors of the device, you'd be able to answer those questions appropriately and not evasively.

Quit making claims of being an inventor of something you didn't invent.

[nemoleg]

Multi-shot Electric Shock Weapon

.................................................. .................................................. ..