I don't think anyone is siding with the racist professor. I'm not, and I believe 1000 times over that Gates is the only one that played the race card and escalated the encounter that day.
I think there MIGHT be some question about whether the elements of the crime were met, what the motivation was for the arrest, and whether it was the best way to handle the situation -- especially given the outrageous allegations that were being leveled at the responding officers by Gates.
I surely don't want fellow officers losing street credibility by ignoring disorderly conduct. Nor do I want them backpedaling from a possible crime in progress which might allow situations to escalate.
I know most here view it as "arrest made: problem solved." And yes, arrest is certainly a good way to address disorderly behavior. Working in the area I do, I encounter many educated and privileged persons similar to Gates. I've dealt with far worse verbal diarrhea on front porches and yards. In such situations involving grown, sober, angry adults, there's little chance such childish outbursts would compel me to arrest. The yelling wouldn't bother me -- it never has before at least.
Now if a third party complained about it, I would go down the ask/tell/make path. I'd definitely get a complainant's statement in writing, even if it was after the fact. It would have to be more than me perceiving passers-by as "looking alarmed." Why? I don't view warrant-less seizures (arrests) of a person on their own property lightly, and neither do attorneys, judges, and the Constitution -- nor should any of us.
Maybe I would have done the same thing as Sgt. Crowley. Hell, maybe I would've even TASER'd Gates. Like the rest of you, I was not there. Based on my life experiences I just find myself wondering, "Why not just leave the d-bag on his porch pouting and drive away?" *shrug*
I think there MIGHT be some question about whether the elements of the crime were met, what the motivation was for the arrest, and whether it was the best way to handle the situation -- especially given the outrageous allegations that were being leveled at the responding officers by Gates.
I surely don't want fellow officers losing street credibility by ignoring disorderly conduct. Nor do I want them backpedaling from a possible crime in progress which might allow situations to escalate.
I know most here view it as "arrest made: problem solved." And yes, arrest is certainly a good way to address disorderly behavior. Working in the area I do, I encounter many educated and privileged persons similar to Gates. I've dealt with far worse verbal diarrhea on front porches and yards. In such situations involving grown, sober, angry adults, there's little chance such childish outbursts would compel me to arrest. The yelling wouldn't bother me -- it never has before at least.
Now if a third party complained about it, I would go down the ask/tell/make path. I'd definitely get a complainant's statement in writing, even if it was after the fact. It would have to be more than me perceiving passers-by as "looking alarmed." Why? I don't view warrant-less seizures (arrests) of a person on their own property lightly, and neither do attorneys, judges, and the Constitution -- nor should any of us.
Maybe I would have done the same thing as Sgt. Crowley. Hell, maybe I would've even TASER'd Gates. Like the rest of you, I was not there. Based on my life experiences I just find myself wondering, "Why not just leave the d-bag on his porch pouting and drive away?" *shrug*
Comment