It's well known there's enough in the PUBLIC record alone to indict Hillary, let alone in the classified record, and last week the head of the Senate Judiciary Committee, Senator Chuck Grassley, sent not-so-subtle signals to all those FBI agents investigating her that it WAS OK TO EITHER LEAK or RESIGN if Obama and Lynch prevented her from being indicted.
http://www.desmoinesregister.com/sto...tion/83385362/
Excerpt from the link above:
U.S. Sen. Chuck Grassley suggested on Friday that the FBI might leak reports of its investigation into presidential candidate Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server as secretary of state.
Grassley, Iowa’s senior senator and chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, said an anonymous and unauthorized release of FBI investigative materials could result if officials at the agency believed prosecution of Clinton was stymied for political reasons.
“Is there going to be political interference? If there’s enough evidence to prosecute, will there be political interference?†Grassley wondered aloud during a breakfast meeting with the Des Moines A.M. Rotary club on Friday. “And if there’s political interference, then I assume that somebody in the FBI is going to leak these reports and it’s either going to have an effect politically or it’s going to lead to prosecution if there’s enough evidence.â€
Democrats are so up in arms about Grassley's "bat signals" being interpreted as a GO AHEAD to LEAK that they've been coming unglued since last week. That's because they know Hillary's ****ed either way.
http://www.desmoinesregister.com/sto...tion/83385362/
Excerpt from the link above:
U.S. Sen. Chuck Grassley suggested on Friday that the FBI might leak reports of its investigation into presidential candidate Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server as secretary of state.
Grassley, Iowa’s senior senator and chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, said an anonymous and unauthorized release of FBI investigative materials could result if officials at the agency believed prosecution of Clinton was stymied for political reasons.
“Is there going to be political interference? If there’s enough evidence to prosecute, will there be political interference?†Grassley wondered aloud during a breakfast meeting with the Des Moines A.M. Rotary club on Friday. “And if there’s political interference, then I assume that somebody in the FBI is going to leak these reports and it’s either going to have an effect politically or it’s going to lead to prosecution if there’s enough evidence.â€
Democrats are so up in arms about Grassley's "bat signals" being interpreted as a GO AHEAD to LEAK that they've been coming unglued since last week. That's because they know Hillary's ****ed either way.
Comment