Leader

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Newt Gingrich - 2012

Collapse

300x250 Mobile

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • OneAdam12
    replied
    I hear a new thread in the back ground.
    Trooper's campaign slogans.


    Terrorism - Let's play Cowboys and Terrorists.
    or - Nuke -em all, let God sort them out.

    Prison over crowding - Give every one guns and keep the ones still standing

    Leave a comment:


  • M1garand
    replied
    Originally posted by westside popo View Post
    Maybe we should start an exploratory committee?

    It would hilarious to see his socialist, I mean democratic opponent get ****ed and throw a tantrum in every debate. Not to mention Trooper's campaign ads.
    I'm for it. Trooper for White House!

    Leave a comment:


  • westside popo
    replied
    Originally posted by M1garand View Post
    If Mr. Trooper enters the race, I'd be more than glad to make financial contribution and host series of $1000 plate dinner parties.
    Maybe we should start an exploratory committee?

    It would hilarious to see his socialist, I mean democratic opponent get ****ed and throw a tantrum in every debate. Not to mention Trooper's campaign ads.

    Leave a comment:


  • M1garand
    replied
    Originally posted by westside popo View Post
    I'm still undecided on Newt.

    But I think it would be a very interesting race if Trooper was to run.
    If Mr. Trooper enters the race, I'd be more than glad to make financial contribution and host series of $1000 plate dinner parties.

    Leave a comment:


  • 1042 Trooper
    replied
    Ah shucks....

    Leave a comment:


  • westside popo
    replied
    I'm still undecided on Newt.

    But I think it would be a very interesting race if Trooper was to run.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sgt. Slaughter
    replied
    I'm still waiting to see who pops up. With the level of inexperience our current President had prior to taking office, I'm not sure some of the others named are good choices.

    Luckily, there's plenty of time for evaluation before election day.

    Leave a comment:


  • mjhoyt27
    replied
    BRB, sending money to his campaign right now!

    Leave a comment:


  • Kieth M.
    replied
    Originally posted by JasperST View Post
    It's time that we righties had a new face though and this trend of the GOP putting the guy in that payed his dues needs to go. That said, I doubt that Newt would get the nomination, too much baggage, figuratively and literally.
    +1 and X2.

    Sorry, Newt, your time has passed and your baggage exceeds our limits.

    Leave a comment:


  • JasperST
    replied
    No one knows who the candidate pick will be, Hillary was the favorite up until near the end. apparently it's just part of the typical process for the left but a sigh of deep division, disunity and on and on when the right works it out.

    It's time that we righties had a new face though and this trend of the GOP putting the guy in that payed his dues needs to go. That said, I doubt that Newt would get the nomination, too much baggage, figuratively and literally.

    Leave a comment:


  • SRT936
    replied
    Originally posted by That Guy View Post
    Who is the candidate the right wants? Trump? Palin? Inquiring minds want to know!
    Allen West, Herman Cain, Marco Rubio. And maybe Paul Ryan for a VP slot.

    Leave a comment:


  • That Guy
    replied
    Who is the candidate the right wants? Trump? Palin? Inquiring minds want to know!

    Leave a comment:


  • FNA209
    replied
    Bad. It's bad for the GOP, it's bad for conservatives, it's bad for the Tea Party (if they are even still there).

    Good. It's a great for the progressives.

    End game- it isn't good for conservatives. He is not the candidate we need or want and he'll be a distraction.

    Leave a comment:


  • IAM Rand
    replied
    Originally posted by BigPat View Post
    Does that mean that we will get to listen to him lecture on morality and how evil the secular-liberal conspiracy is?
    Better than listening to Common at the White House spewing his BS to a cheering Barak and Michelle

    Leave a comment:


  • Sgt. Slaughter
    replied
    Originally posted by BigPat View Post
    Does that mean that we will get to listen to him lecture on morality and how evil the secular-liberal conspiracy is?
    I doubt it. The clip I saw of him referenced leaving his past in the past. He was mostly focused on jobs and the economy.

    Of course, we could always whip out the Clinton blurb: "It's the economy, stupid."

    Leave a comment:

MR300x250 Tablet

Collapse

What's Going On

Collapse

There are currently 5623 users online. 342 members and 5281 guests.

Most users ever online was 158,966 at 04:57 AM on 01-16-2021.

Welcome Ad

Collapse
Working...
X