NEW Welcome Ad

Collapse

Leader

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Bush overturns ban on CCW in National Parks

Collapse

300x250 Mobile

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Bush overturns ban on CCW in National Parks

    Pres. Bush signed an order overturning he current 20+ year ban on carrying loaded weapons in a National Park. If you have a CCW and are allowed to carry a weapon in the state where the park is located, you will be allowed to carry in the National Park in that state. This takes place mid-January, 2009.

    It's about time.



    ""Once again, political leaders in the Bush administration have ignored the preferences of the American public by succumbing to political pressure, in this case generated by the National Rifle Association," said Bill Wade, president of the Coalition of National Park Service Retirees.

    "This regulation will put visitors, employees and precious resources of the National Park System at risk. We will do everything possible to overturn it and return to a commonsense approach to guns in national parks that has been working for decades," Wade said."


    How exactly does this put "precious resources of the National Park System at risk"?
    Last edited by dbphotos; 12-06-2008, 10:28 PM.
    David Bailey Photography | Bailey Tactical

    sigpic

    "Live your life in such a way that when your feet hit the floor satan shudders and says oh hell he's awake!"

  • #2
    This was long overdue. Wonder if Barry feels differently on this issue?

    Comment


    • #3
      According to the article, "The park rule will be published in the Federal Register next week and take effect 30 days later, well before Obama takes office Jan. 20. Overturning the rule could take months or even years, since it would require the new administration to restart the lengthy rule-making process."
      David Bailey Photography | Bailey Tactical

      sigpic

      "Live your life in such a way that when your feet hit the floor satan shudders and says oh hell he's awake!"

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by dbphotos
        "Once again, political leaders in the Bush administration have ignored the preferences of the American public by succumbing to political pressure, in this case generated by the National Rifle Association," said Bill Wade, president of the Coalition of National Park Service Retirees.

        "This regulation will put visitors, employees and precious resources of the National Park System at risk. We will do everything possible to overturn it and return to a commonsense approach to guns in national parks that has been working for decades," Wade said."
        I continue to be amazed a bureaucrats who think that citizens lawfully carrying concealed weapons results in a deluge of safety issues. Forty-eight states now have some form of concealed carry, and we're not having wild west gunfights like some anti-gun advocates predicted.

        "A fanatic is one who won't change his mind, and won't change the subject." -Winston Churchill

        "I don't make jokes. I just watch the government and report the facts." -Will Rogers

        "To desire to save these wolves in society may arise from benevolence, but it must be the benevolence of a child or a fool" -Henry Fielding

        Comment


        • #5
          Very cool map!
          David Bailey Photography | Bailey Tactical

          sigpic

          "Live your life in such a way that when your feet hit the floor satan shudders and says oh hell he's awake!"

          Comment


          • #6
            It will sure make life easier for those that carry lawfully. The evidence is in that CCW helps to reduce crime but as with many liberal philosophies it doesn't matter. It will be interesting to see what happens to that map in the next four years.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by JasperST
              It will sure make life easier for those that carry lawfully. The evidence is in that CCW helps to reduce crime but as with many liberal philosophies it doesn't matter. It will be interesting to see what happens to that map in the next four years.
              Yup. More guns in the right hands (simply, law-abiding citizens) really does equal less crime. They learned that lesson in Orlando back in 1966, but it seems that it was quickly forgotten.
              In Orlando, Florida, in 1966 a series of brutal rapes swept the
              community. Citizens reacted to the tripling in the rate of rape
              over the previous year by buying handguns for self-defense; 200-300
              firearms were being purchased each week from dealers, and an unknown
              number more from private parties. The newspaper there, the _Orlando
              Sentinel Star_, had an anti-gun editorial stance and tried to pressure
              the local police chief and city government to stop the flow of arms.

              When that tactic failed, the paper decided that in the interest of
              public safety, they would sponsor a gun-training seminar in conjunction
              with the local police. Plans were made for a one-day training course at
              a local city park.

              Plans were made for an expected 400-500 women. However,
              more than 2500 women arrived, and brought with them every conceivable
              kind of firearm. They had to park many blocks away, and the weapons
              were carried in in purses, paper bags, boxes, briefcases, holsters,
              and womens' hands. One police officer present said he'd never been so
              scared in his life. [It must have been quite a sight! :-) ]

              Swamped, the organizers hastily dismissed the women with promises for
              a more thorough course with scheduled appointments. The course offered
              was for three classes/week, and within 6 months, the Orlando police had
              trained more than 6000 women in basic pistol marksmanship and the law
              of self-defense.

              The results?

              In 1966 there were 36 rapes in Orlando, triple the 1965 rate. In 1967,
              there were 4. Before the training, rape rates had been increasing in
              Orlando as nationwide. 5 years after the training, rape was still
              below pre-training levels in Orlando, but up 308% in the surrounding
              areas, 96% for Florida overall, and 64% nationally.

              Also in 1967, violent assault and burglary decreased by 25% in Orlando,
              in addition to the rape reductions.

              In 1967, NOT A SINGLE WOMAN HAD FIRED HER WEAPON in self-defense. In
              1967, NOT A SINGLE WOMAN HAD TURNED HER GUN ON HER HUSBAND OR BOYFRIEND.
              (No data are available for later years.)

              The reason the program worked so spectacularly well is that it was
              widely known that Orlando women had the means and training to defend
              themselves from attackers. Rapists, being (somewhat) human, they are
              learning engines; they took their business elsewhere--to the detriment
              of the defenseless in those other locations.

              Comment


              • #8
                I'm gonna put that map on my website. Cool.
                The All New
                2013
                BBQ and Goldfish Pond Club
                Sully - IAM Rand - JasperST - L1 - The Tick - EmmaPeel - Columbus - LA Dep - SgtSlaughter - OneAdam12 - Retired96 - Iowa #1603
                - M1Garand

                (any BBQ and Goldfish Pond member may nominate another user for membership but just remember ..... this ain't no weenie roast!)



                Comment


                • #9
                  Aint a Liberal Administration grand?....


                  Judge Blocks Rule Permitting Concealed Guns In U.S. Parks


                  Washington Post Staff Writers
                  Friday, March 20, 2009; Page A09

                  A federal judge yesterday blocked a last-minute rule enacted by President George W. Bush allowing visitors to national parks to carry concealed weapons.

                  U.S. District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly issued a preliminary injunction in a lawsuit brought by gun-control advocates and environmental groups. The Justice Department had sought to block the injunction against the controversial rule.

                  The three groups that brought the suit -- the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence, the National Parks Conservation Association and the Coalition of National Park Service Retirees -- argued that the Bush action violated several laws.

                  In her ruling, Kollar-Kotelly agreed that the government's process had been "astoundingly flawed."

                  She noted that the government justified its decision to forgo an environmental analysis on the grounds that the rule does not "authorize" environmental impacts. Calling this a "tautology," she wrote that officials "abdicated their Congressionally-mandated obligation" to evaluate environmental impacts and "ignored (without sufficient explanation) substantial information in the administrative record concerning environmental impacts" of the rule.


                  Interior Department spokeswoman Kendra Barkoff said the department could not comment because of "ongoing litigation."

                  The regulation, which took effect Jan. 9, allowed visitors to carry loaded, concealed guns into national parks and wildlife refuges if state laws there allowed it in public places. In most cases, a state permit would be required to carry a concealed weapon into a national park.

                  In the past, guns had been allowed in such areas only if they were unloaded, stored or dismantled; gun rights advocates said they saw no reason to be denied the right to carry concealed weapons in parks when they could in other public places.

                  Bryan Faehner, associate director for park uses at the National Parks Conservation Association, said his group is "extremely pleased" with both the court decision and the fact that Interior is now conducting an internal review of the rule's environmental impact. "This decision by the courts reaffirms our concerns, and the concerns of park rangers across the country, that this new regulation . . . has serious impacts on the parks and increases the risk of opportunistic poaching of wildlife in the parks, and increases the risk to park visitors," Faehner said.
                  Be safe pulling back into the thread...
                  http://infidelswithhonor.com/

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Faehner = idiot.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      +1 lol....

                      Comment

                      MR300x250 Tablet

                      Collapse

                      What's Going On

                      Collapse

                      There are currently 23237 users online. 54 members and 23183 guests.

                      Most users ever online was 158,966 at 04:57 AM on 01-16-2021.

                      Welcome Ad

                      Collapse
                      Working...
                      X
                      😀
                      🥰
                      🤢
                      😎
                      😡
                      👍
                      👎